Guangzhou UC Instruments., Co. Ltd.
Guangzhou UC Instruments., Co. Ltd.
Add to Cart
SFP28 Evaluation Test Board Is Suitable For 25Gbps Product Testing
Evaluate board design considerations
Compatibility: The evaluation board should be compatible with different brands and models of 25G SFP28 optical modules to ensure versatility and flexibility in different scenarios.
Interface standards: The evaluation board should follow standard interfaces such as SFF-8431 and SFF-8432 to ensure proper connection and communication with the optical module.
Performance parameters: The evaluation board should be able to accurately measure and evaluate the key performance parameters of the 25G SFP28 optical module, such as transmission rate, transmission distance, power consumption, operating temperature range, etc.
Reliability: The evaluation board should have good stability and reliability to ensure the normal operation in a long time and harsh environment.
Ease of use: The evaluation board should provide a friendly user interface and convenient operation to facilitate users to test modules and record data.
| NO. | Index | Maximum value | Minimum value | unit |
| 1 | Data rate | 56 | 1.25 | Gbps |
| 2 | Adjustable output supply voltage | 4 | 2.8 | V |
| 3 | Accuracy of tension voltage regulation | 5 | mV | |
| 4 | Monitoring voltage accuracy | 5 | mV | |
| 5 | Monitoring current | 1000 | 0 | mA |
| 6 | Monitoring current accuracy | 0.1 | mA | |
| 7 | I2C rate | 400 | 100 | KHz |
| 8 | Power supply voltage (external DC power input voltage) | 5.5 | 4 | V |
| 9 | Operating temperature | 85 | -40 | °C |
| 10 | Communication mode | USB HID,No drive. | ||
| 11 | TX,RX Electrical interface type | 40GHz 2.92mm female | ||
| 12 | Input/output level type | CML | ||
Evaluate board functional requirements
Module identification and configuration: The evaluation board should be able to automatically identify and configure the connected 25G SFP28 optical module, including its type, rate, operating mode, etc.
Performance test: The evaluation board should be able to perform performance tests on optical modules, including transmission rate test, bit error rate test, optical power test, etc.
Monitoring and alarm: The evaluation board should be able to monitor the working status of the optical module in real time, and send an alarm signal when there is an anomaly, so that measures can be taken in time.
Data recording and analysis: The evaluation board should be able to record test data and provide data analysis capabilities to help users better understand the performance and stability of the optical module.
